Sphinn
What's Sphinn?  |  Join us!  |  Login  | Help | Tools

  • Hot Topics
  • What's New
  • Greatest Hits
  • Comments
  • Submit
  • Calendar
  • Network
  • Feeds
  • Search Engine Land
  • All Categories
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Microsoft
  • Search Marketing
  • Social Media
  • Online Marketing
  • Searching
  • Other
  •      :: Sphinn Live ::

Sphinn Home » Google SEO
  • 55
  • Sphinn It!
Paid Links: Google Doesn’t Know the Face of “Evil”
Avatar Went Hot: September 25, 2007 - 10:28 am
Posted By: Sugarrae 234 days ago
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.sugarrae.com) my network
Category: Google SEO
I had an interesting run in with the "elusive face of evil" that Google is always hunting for and went on a subsequent rant on Google's policing of paid links.
8 Comments     

  • Comments
  • Who Sphunn This (55)
  • Who Desphunn This (0)

Comments

from planetc1 234 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

F**king great post! I bet that we've all experienced this at one point or another. It's likely a practice that is happening in many places folks are not aware of.

from Jill 233 days ago #
Votes: 1 | Vote:
+ -

Excellent! 

Probably some link monkey approached her once awhile back and offered to pay for a review, and the lightbulb went off in her head. Good for her, although it would be nice if she was at least honest in her reviews. 

1 for the link buyers; 0 for Matt Cutts


from crimsongirl 233 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Depressing.  She thinks paid links are OK.  I bet she didn't even report the site to Google.

 


from Sugarrae 233 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Well, it would have been stupid for her to report the site to Google as we weren't *looking* to buy links.

from hugoguzman 233 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

I agree with your premise, but I would add that Google's effort to stamp out traditional paid links (a list of links on a navigation bar or footer) will only help to make the paid link industry more sophisticated, and that's actually a good thing.

I've always championed the cause of "responsible" paid linking. If you pay to have your link included on a relevant site/blog (regardless of the method) it will only help to improve Google's search results. But spammy directories and paid links that lack relevance (a football link on a site about CSS scripting, for example) hurt overall search results.

So in a sense, Google's paid-links crusade might actually be a good thing, in a roundabout and ironic way. 


from lucia 233 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

The funny thing about people approaching a blogger out of the blue for paid links is the vast price range. Some people approach you, offer oh... $50 for a fairly sizeable image ad on the sidebar that is to run one full year.  (You reject these on the grounds that you make five times more running adsense. They try to convince you that the $50 is better 'cuz it's certain money. Yes, this happened....)

Other people approach you and offer a $200 to turn an individual word on an already existing blog post into a link to their catalog and leave it up a year.  (Also happened.)

 


from MiriamEllis 233 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

My thought is with the size of the readership quoted here and the major traffic that might mean for a company who was reviewed by this lady, $500 might not actually be too high. An audience like that, reading a good review, could generate an awful lot of sales ... if this was a product-oriented review. I mean, say you invest $500 and make $5000 back. Seems kind of good to me.

 

Now, as to the ethics of people writing great reviews that dupe the public into believing products are good....well, we already have TV for that.

Miriam 


from fantomaster 233 days ago #
Votes: 2 | Vote:
+ -

Let's always bear in mind that "Evil" (esp. with a capital E) is NEVER about what YOU do, it's always about what OTHERS do. No reason to expect Google to be different.

And yes, attempting to detect that kind of paid links is inane and claiming they can actually do it is merely the same old sorry FUD strategy of despair they're actually becoming famous for now. And rightly so.



Log in to comment or register here.

Who Sphunn This Topic?

  1. Avatar Sugarrae
  2. Avatar planetc1
  3. Avatar tamar
  4. Avatar Rhea
  5. Avatar 0thelisa
  6. Avatar Lyndon
  7. Avatar fantomaster
  8. Avatar Jill
  9. Avatar DavidWallace
  10. Avatar DanielleWinfield
  11. Avatar jimbeetle
  12. Avatar MattC
  13. Avatar toddmintz
  14. Avatar JohnWeb
  15. Avatar DoshDosh
  16. Avatar NickWilsdon
  17. Avatar sphinn007
  18. Avatar zacharyfox
  19. Avatar dannysullivan
  20. Avatar dedmond29
  21. Avatar graywolf
  22. Avatar Feydakin
  23. Avatar AndyBeard
  24. Avatar Sebastian
  25. Avatar DazzlinDonna
  26. Avatar lucia
  27. Avatar SisterSledge
  28. Avatar bhartzer
  29. Avatar DVOLA
  30. Avatar HamletBatista
  31. Avatar MattMcGee
  32. Avatar qwerty
  33. Avatar DJLitten
  34. Avatar sphinnthis
  35. Avatar flyingrose
  36. Avatar peterdavanzo
  37. Avatar msaleem
  38. Avatar Lisaweb
  39. Avatar christine
  40. Avatar Winooski
  41. Avatar dlarson104
  42. Avatar marthyvp
  43. Avatar SimonHeseltine
  44. Avatar oggin
  45. Avatar webuildpages
  46. Avatar xenopii
  47. Avatar MattKeegan
  48. Avatar DariaGoetsch
  49. Avatar ITC76
  50. Avatar aimClear
  51. Avatar ManishPandey
  52. Avatar floppy
  53. Avatar Yogini
  54. Avatar nolimitdomains
  55. Avatar HafizD

Who Desphunn This Topic what is desphinn?

Related Links

There are no related links for this story.

Top 10 Most Sphunn
In What's New

  1. SEO Bullshit Bingo (20)
  2. Relevance and Appeal (20)
  3. Why www.arsecommerce Is A Bad URL (18)
  4. Google: “All your index are belong ... (18)
  5. Search Engine Watch Forums Names Ch... (18)
  6. A Letter of Apology to my Wrists (17)
  7. The Social Media Trip (17)
  8. How You Can Use WordPress Functions... (16)
  9. Search Marketing Trends - What's up... (16)
  10. Community: The Human Element of SEO... (15)

Latest Comments

  • incrediblehelp: partying with BUSH? not likely. ;-)…
  • Some interesting thoughts - anyway, here in germany the social media thing …
  • DarkMatter - that's interesting that merely changing the title tag allows i…
  • nice!  where is "hand job?" :p…
  • Nice writeup, but what I think it would even be cooler and more useful to t…
  • @
  • Linkbait is the Paris Hilton approach to online marketing.  Your site beco…
  • I must admit, Eric, that I have trained my spam filter so that by now most …
  • - read more -
Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
• SMX Madrid (in Spanish, May 20-21)
• SMX Advanced - Seattle, WA (June 3-4) Register today!
• SMX Local & Mobile - San Francisco, CA (July 24-25) See the agenda, and register now!
• SMX East - NYC - (Oct. 6-8)
• SMX London - November 4 & 5, 2008

©2008 Third Door Media, Inc. Privacy Policy & Terms. All rights reserved.

Contact Us  |  Sphinn Staff     powered by Pligg