Paid Links: Google Doesn’t Know the Face of “Evil”

Sorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.

54
Sphinn It!

Went Hot: Sep 25, 2007 - 10:28 am
Posted By: Sugarrae 901 Days ago
Source: http://www.sugarrae.com
Category: SEO

I had an interesting run in with the "elusive face of evil" that Google is always hunting for and went on a subsequent rant on Google’s policing of paid links.

8 Comments

Comments

from planetc1 901 Days ago #

Votes: 0

F**king great post! I bet that we’ve all experienced this at one point or another. It’s likely a practice that is happening in many places folks are not aware of.

from Jill 901 Days ago #

Votes: 1

Excellent! Probably some link monkey approached her once awhile back and offered to pay for a review, and the lightbulb went off in her head. Good for her, although it would be nice if she was at least honest in her reviews. 1 for the link buyers; 0 for Matt Cutts

from crimsongirl 901 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Depressing. She thinks paid links are OK. I bet she didn’t even report the site to Google.

from Sugarrae 901 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Well, it would have been stupid for her to report the site to Google as we weren’t *looking* to buy links.

from hugoguzman 901 Days ago #

Votes: 0

I agree with your premise, but I would add that Google’s effort to stamp out traditional paid links (a list of links on a navigation bar or footer) will only help to make the paid link industry more sophisticated, and that’s actually a good thing.I’ve always championed the cause of "responsible" paid linking. If you pay to have your link included on a relevant site/blog (regardless of the method) it will only help to improve Google’s search results. But spammy directories and paid links that lack relevance (a football link on a site about CSS scripting, for example) hurt overall search results. So in a sense, Google’s paid-links crusade might actually be a good thing, in a roundabout and ironic way.

from lucia 901 Days ago #

Votes: 0

The funny thing about people approaching a blogger out of the blue for paid links is the vast price range. Some people approach you, offer oh... $50 for a fairly sizeable image ad on the sidebar that is to run one full year. (You reject these on the grounds that you make five times more running adsense. They try to convince you that the $50 is better ’cuz it’s certain money. Yes, this happened....) Other people approach you and offer a $200 to turn an individual word on an already existing blog post into a link to their catalog and leave it up a year. (Also happened.)

from MiriamEllis 901 Days ago #

Votes: 0

My thought is with the size of the readership quoted here and the major traffic that might mean for a company who was reviewed by this lady, $500 might not actually be too high. An audience like that, reading a good review, could generate an awful lot of sales ... if this was a product-oriented review. I mean, say you invest $500 and make $5000 back. Seems kind of good to me. Now, as to the ethics of people writing great reviews that dupe the public into believing products are good....well, we already have TV for that.Miriam

from fantomaster 901 Days ago #

Votes: 2

Let’s always bear in mind that "Evil" (esp. with a capital E) is NEVER about what YOU do, it’s always about what OTHERS do. No reason to expect Google to be different.And yes, attempting to detect that kind of paid links is inane and claiming they can actually do it is merely the same old sorry FUD strategy of despair they’re actually becoming famous for now. And rightly so.