- 17
- Sphinn It!
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://searchengineland.com)
Category: SEM
4 Comments
4 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX West - Feb. 10-12, 2009
SMX Munich - April 22-23, 2009
SMX Advanced - June 2-3, 2009
Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.
Comments
What a waste of campaign money to run an ad like that. I hope Google is charging them a high CPC for that.
That landing page is terrible. By 2012 they'll probably have it right, but I think this proves that SEM hasn't really come of age in politics just yet.
Obama could be running all sorts of ads. How about using this picture:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com//gadgets/slideshows/249/webpix//slide_249_4.jpeg and then run the following:
Palin obliterates Grizzly Bears
And will obliterate the economy too
Find out why you shouldn't trust her
sarah-palin.barrackobama.com
Big business and big brand names don't need search marketing. SEO is for people who are invisible, trying to gain visibility. Will Obama/McCain gain more search traffic if they had a clue? Sure. But they can pay their bills without that traffic.
Give me a ring if anyone in the SEO industry rakes in more money per quarter off the internet than Obama.
I think PPC has a genuine role to play in politics. For instance, although my example above was a joke, if the Obama campaign bought ads that critized Sarah Palin they'd get a pretty high CTR. Then the landing page could be full of information on things she voted for with negative connotations, drugs she took when she was young etc.
All you'd have to do is plant the seed of doubt in a voters mind about a person/issue. Especially on things that might not get a lot of coverage in the media. And if the person that clicked on the ad learnt something controvercial they'd probably tell their friends about it.