Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://searchengineland.com)
Category: Google SEO
3 Comments
3 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX China (Nanjing) - Sept. 23-24
SMX Stockholm - Sept. 23-24: See who's speaking or register now.
SMX East (New York City) - Oct.
6-8: See the agenda or register today and save!
SMX London - Nov. 4-5: Pre-agenda rate now available. Click here.
Comments
Seems a bit niche oriented to me, but there are people for whom these capabilities will be important.
Yeah, I struggled with why anyone would really need that unavailable tag when taking the page down should be enough. Don't get me wrong -- I still love having the option. Just couldn't think of an example. But europeforvisitors over at WebmasterWorld raised a good point in this thread:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/3394134.htm
"Example: A manufacturer's rebate page with a July 30 expiration date, or an e-commerce site with a sale that ends on August 10."
That's perfect. I mean, it is a pain that this stuff will live for several days to months after it comes down. If you can tell Google not to bother with it after a set time, that's useful.
The header support is very useful if for some reason you can't do a robots.txt file easily but have some non-HTML documents you want to block. You can't put meta robots tags in them so this gives you an alternative. I think it will be more clear when the official help info comes online.
See also SEJ on some SEO impacts of the new tag here:
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-impact-of-googles-unavailable_after-meta-tag/5333/
And already submitted to Sphinn here:
http://sphinn.com/story/693