Published: Sep 28, 2007 - 07:49 am
Story Found By: AndyBeard 2093 Days ago
Category: SEO
7 Comments
7 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Shaun might point the firm suing him here:http://www.seobook.com/archives/001522.shtmlhttp://www.mattcutts.com/blog/confirming-a-penalty/Matt never went to court, but he got legal clearance to make a statement that pretty much wiped out that case.
Thanks Danny (links a bit funny) so - http://www.seobook.com/archives/001522.shtml andhttp://www.mattcutts.com/blog/confirming-a-penalty/
"Googles vague guidelines".Huh?Theyre only vague if you are constantly looking for a loophole in them so you can say "well it didnt exactly say that".Those guidelines get clearer and clearer all the time. I recently read some article that said 90% of people that call themselves SEOs are snake-oil salesman. Im sure that was an understatement.I have no idea which SEO firm the guy is outing, but good luck to you mate. I hope you nail em.
Cheers for that. To be honest it is a frightening prospect getting more so by the day. Ive got an opinion on something, and Ive spoken out, and picked the fight, but each day passes and i question my motives, evidence, my own knowledge, my own history, and faith (in seo).It is such a gray area, but can you believe it gets more complicated by the day. Recent communications (not with me but another getting sued) have left me gasping. It is so unbelievable, and its further complicated matters (i think for seo firm!)Perhaps my idea of spammy evidence (domains, directories etc) isnt everybody elses? How do I know whats ethical, Ive only been in the industry ten minutes compared to some.I dont name the company, I didnt finish the test (at the very beginning this was an experiment) and ive clearly stated in the article its my opinion. Ill not even confirm if the article was about the company suing me, at this stage. One of the reasons Im not just taking down the article is because they want money out of me, and Im not paying THEM a penny! Ill give double away first, even to a lawyer.
I will just give an example that is on my blogOn some pages I have some quite large tag clouds. I actually allow them to grow dynamically based on the number of external links on a page.How many entries can you have in a tag cloud before Google would regard it as keyword stuffing or it starts to dilute the topical value in the main article (which is quite long)
>Theyre only vague if you are constantly looking for a loophole in them so you can say "well it didnt exactly say that". Im pretty sure thats a big part of a lawyers job :-)
From my own experience, the lawyers who send out the defamation notices are basically working as attack dogs - theyll try and sound as ferocious as possible, but often its more bark than bite. Bear that in mind and ensure you receive professional legal advice to help expose that and ensure you know what your own position is.