Published: Sep 29, 2007 - 03:14 pm
Story Found By: aimClear 1704 Days ago
Category: Social Media
8 Comments
8 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Right..my feelings exactly. Its better to post much less and be original.
I dont think this article is referring to rewriting posts (I hate that too). I think its just that we should be getting ideas from others on "how" to do things better. I like to study "the masters" to see how they do things, and I have learned a lot from them.
This is one of the basics of keyword research - if you see something that is working figure out how you can make it work for you too.
I dont object to copying sections with appropriate references to the source within the post as long as the author is adding perspective, criticism, or value.
@seobrian: If someone was adding their perspective, peppering the post with links to your/my original post, Id likely welcome that, and I suspect some others would as well. Unfortunately, thats not the way its typically happening.@everyone: Just last night I discovered a site that ripped about 8 articles and images from me to create content for their new site. What sucks is there often is this mindset (in this case the person knows me) that its OK to rip content within niches. Curious to know if this happens in the world of SEO as well.
This is more about style and structure than ripping of copy, Most copywriters will have a swipfile. If you see an article titled "13 ways to get a date" that you know worked well you might change it to "13 ways to get that job" of course the rest of the article will be changed too.
Thanks Doolally, I see your point.Marty
I think the article is akin to another Sphinn article that discusses asks "Which blogging style are you?" Seeing what voice, style and structure works for others is a great way to help your own blog There are limitations of course, as no one will be able to completely capture the same style as, for example, the Onion. Even if you do, most will see it as a rip off of the original. The best advice, as always, is to read as many diverse styles as possible and use bits and pieces towards your own unique voice.