Published: Sep 28, 2007 - 03:48 am
Story Found By: webuildpages 2059 Days ago
Category: Link Building
13 Comments
13 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Good stuff, Jim (as usual). Can you imagine what the SERPs would look like if all these sites got banned? Holy [beep].......
Well put Jim.
Good article Jim, as you say, Matt must be over the moon with the FUD this topic is creating. No offence to him, I think hes played Googles position excellently. There are times I think hes the best marketer of us all! ;-)
Great post. In addition, the one example Matt Cutts has given for a site supposedly penalized for paid links turned out to be a question of cloaking. Cloaking, totally nothing to do with paid links.Add to the list the many examples of SEO sites that clearly sell text links AND are visited by Matt Cutts (seroundtable for example) and there is essentially more evidence that they dont penalize than that they do. I doubt its the 302 though but thats another topic.
Jim....another great blog post. Although my favorite of yours is still you co-citation post.
Im gonna break with tradition and say that every now and then google make an example of someone and say nothing. Johnchow.com being a recent example.
Great post Jim!
The site still has a penalty applied to it and just because its probably not a paid links penalty doesnt mean its not SOME sort of penalty.Easy way to tell is when you just search Google for the domain name without the .com/.net/.co.uk etc. is that is should return a result with that domain name on top.For example search "jimboykin" all one word and it comes up with jimboykin.com but search for a site known to be penalized like the "avivadirectory" and it doesnt show up unless you search for "avivadirectory.com" expressly.I could give you tons of examples and its always the same for a penalized site that you have to add the DOT COM before they show up.This is obviously a clue but we dont know what symptoms invoke this clue, such as any penalty or just specific penalties, but its certainly a problem with "davidairey"s site.
Just wish to mention that I have posted my remarks about Jim Boykins article in this thread on a separate post: Jim Boykins & Aaron Walls Unethical Approach to Paid Linkshttp://sphinn.com/story/7623
I completely agree with you :)
Id be interested to hear Jims take on Dannys report over the weekend that in fact Google will be penalizing your rankings for selling links. Is this just more FUD or is there substance to their claim? Or is it a bit of both (as things usually are with Google)?
Ive got a comment on there with my thoughts.
Finally someone who makes sense vs. riding the hysteria wave. Thanks for this post.