Calendar
Network
Feeds
- 67
- Sphinn It!
Went Hot: October 2, 2008 - 8:43 pm
Posted By: ciaran 60 days ago
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.seomoz.org)
Category: SEM Industry
;)
12 Comments
Went Hot: October 2, 2008 - 8:43 pm
Posted By: ciaran 60 days ago
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.seomoz.org)
Category: SEM Industry
;)
12 Comments
Top 10 Most Sphunn
In What's New
- Google Launches a Sweet Competitive... (18)
- Could you Buy or Sell Social Media ... (16)
- 30 Tips on How to Get, Convince, Ke... (14)
- Rumors: Microsoft in talks to buy Y... (11)
- How To Actually Get Links From Your... (11)
- Top 10 Reasons for PPC & SEO Synerg... (11)
- fRank Takes on PageRank (10)
- 16 Business Lessons for Freelancers (9)
- Backlinks index size comparison bet... (8)
- How to Write SEO Content (8)
Latest Comments
- DianeV makes an excellent point about expansion. There is a way to do thi…
- Good luck with WebPosition. I had to find another program due to issues wit…
- Interesting article for me (an avid android fan and apple disliker) as this…
- My personal Facebook profile has nearly 1000 friends, I wonder how much I c…
- Tnx Brian.... the titles aren't exactly link bait are they? lol…
- From the people that I have spoken to about this, I was a tad worried it mi…
- Source material:
- Can someone start by trying to educate all the thick-as-shit idiot link dro…
- - read more -
Save the date for:
• SMX West - Feb. 10-12, 2009
• SMX Munich - April 22-23, 2009
• SMX Social Media Marketing - April 29-30
• SMX Advanced - June 2-3, 2009
Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.
Upcoming Webcasts:
Comments
If you're going to mention Lyndon in this context... then I think there is but one simple question to answer.
If the website owner had asked Lyndon, in advance, "is there a risk in this?", what would he have said in reply?
I mentioned Lyndon as a joke. Obviously wasn't that funny...
I was being rhetorical too. Ah well, I'll retire to bed for the rest of the day...
The whole paid links / nofollow thing is bad and wrong because nobody should NEED to read Google's webmaster guidelines in order to have a website and be successful with it.
End of story, imo.
"End of story, imo."
Not end of story.
You can have a website and completely ignore Google guidelines as long as you understand you may not get traffic from Google. If Google was Mohican Sun or Atlantic City is it wrong for Google to set ground house rules or do I get to walk in and say its wrong for Google to take my money when my cards add up to 23?
You think Google is the only website with rules? http://www.link-o-rama.com/greenguy/therules.htm
What happens if an adult webmaster submits a free site with a girl going from nude to fully clothed? You don't get listed. You don't get traffic. Why? Bookmarkers don't like pics out of order (imagine that).
People insist on a one-way street relationship with Google. I give Google nothing and Google gives me tons of $$$. So its wrong for Google to expect me to meet it halfway? I don't think so.
Sure, I shouldn't have to use nofollow. Google *should* be able to figure stuff out on its own. Should some of Google's house rules be changed? Absolutely. But its not wrong for Google to set house rules. Every website does.
If *I* mention Lyndongate in the comments, will you give me £20?
@halfdeck, you give Google free access to copy and cache all your work which they use to make millions of dollars on.. Seems like you are giving them quite a bit to me..
If everyone took away their content what would Google have?? If you took Google away, what would we have?? The answers are easy, nothing and the same thing we had before Google..
Feydakin: agreed. A lot of people seem to forget that without all of our content, google dies a quick and painful death. On the flipside, if Google disapeared, life would be about the same for us, just with a different search engine. History repeats itself.
I won't repeat my 1/2 cohearant babblings from the comments, but I will say this topic is a good subject because there are far too few resources for the amateur or novice webmaster that educate about the risks involved in linking. Well, at least that aren't burried under crap or aren't as long as a small novel.
You are can have a website and completely ignore Google guidelines as long as you understand you may not get traffic from Google. If Google was Mohican Sun or Atlantic City is it wrong for Google to set ground house rules or do I get to walk in and say its wrong for Google to take my money when my cards add up to 23?
I trust Google will do the right thing and put me back to where I was before all the DP mess.
@Halfdeck, yes it is Google's engine and they can certainly make whatever rules they would like. I just don't personally think it's very smart of them to make a rule that falls outside of how someone might typically build a website if Google didn't exist.
I strongly believe that nobody should ever have to read Google's guidelines to be able to be found by people looking for what they offer. But with this one "guideline" suddenly you have to.
"I just don't personally think it's very smart of them to make a rule that falls outside of how someone might typically build a website if Google didn't exist."
I agree Jill but the fact of the matter is we do things outside the relm of "just building website" anyway with or without Google guidelines. Staying away from flash-only website, optimizing TITLE elements, etc. The only time doing things for Google becomes a problem is when that activity creates a conflict of interest (e.g. nofollowing a paid link leads to loss of monthly TLA revenue).