Published: Oct 04, 2007 - 05:45 am
Story Found By: kevgibbo 1592 Days ago
Category: SEO
10 Comments
10 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Ill drink to that! I hate CMS. Get a coder, do a custom quality job.PS: The site used as example might not be the most appropriate as that person seems to have a world full of problems. SEO if the last of her concerns.
I agree with the sentiment in this article. But large CMS manufacturers who pitch to business dont even go near mentioning SEO. They offer a product that is quicker than handwriting a site, which means more done in less time, which means money saved.Of course, the inherent problem is that it is also likely more money lost in sales to companies who are optimizing and more visible to searchers. Still, it gives SEOs another reason to pitch SEO.Good find. Worth mentioning for sure.
Duplicate content issues (multiple URLs for same "page"), non-optimised titles and descriptions, poor internal navigation, paginated content(where what is on "page 1" today is on "page 2" tomorrow), lack of use of external files for CSS and JS, and presenting bots with millions of "error. you are not logged in." pages, means that most forums, blogs, carts, and other CMS products perform very badly compared with what they could do if all of those factors had been sorted out at the design stage.Heck, if just vBulletin were to fix the "you are not logged in" error pages from attempting to be indexed, and fixed the Duplicate Content issues caused by the *nextnewest and *nextoldest links, and by having multiple duplicate URLs with inconsistent parameter ordering, Google would potentially have at least a few hundred million useless URLs less to spider each month.
I couldnt agree more with the previous comments. I had trouble working with a site which had implemented a CMS system which churned out uncessary code, page download was slow also, a nightmare!! One thing for certain when you choose a CMS, if there was such a system which takes SEO into equation then dupe content and code bloat is something which needs to be addressed.
I agree that most CMSs are bad, but the problem is that people start building a web site with the CMS in mind, rather than the other way around. You need to build a web site, then integrate a CMS with it. Ive worked on a lot of sites that use CMS and work really well with search engines... the problem, also, is that so many people use wordpress or blogging systems for non-blog web sites just for the cms. Thats not a good idea.
Honestly, I dont care if sites dont have proper SEO. I care about the content. The emergence of the CMS has allowed actual writers to create and run websites. Thats better for the internet than SEO. In fact, I think you should see this as a blessing. There is all kinds of SEO business out there as a result and sure it might be a pain to work around a poorly designed CMS, but guess what... you dont get paid for doing nothing.I have to completely disagree with the sentiment of this article. Id rather see bad SEO and good content than the reverse.
Hey jgoddard, could you (or anyone) elaborate a bit more on why using WordPress as a CMS system is "not a good idea?" Thanks!
*** Honestly, I dont care if sites dont have proper SEO. ***Really? Some of the issues inherent in the site design of some systems stop those sites from being indexed or "treated seriously" by search engines.*** could you (or anyone) elaborate a bit more on why using WordPress as a CMS system is "not a good idea?" *** I provided a list of some of the most common problems near the top of the page.
"Some of the issues inherent in the site design of some systems stop those sites from being indexed or "treated seriously" by search engines."---See too many of these posts come from the point of view of "Im the one building the site" instead of "Im the one reading the site". If sites that I dont own/control want to build them so they are hard to find, Im not really concerned. If they build them so I do find them, but there content sucks... well then Im annoyed.
Contrary to popular belief, not many website owners care about SEO or want to worry about it. We would like to believe that the entire internet world exists on SEO alone, but it doesnt. In fact - the industry itself is very small compared to the number of websites online.CMS have created a way for people to get online easier, with that comes our part to deliver education on the importance of SEO and how it relates to delivering sales and results for the user. I enjoy clients who call me with commercialized CMS websites, Im a software developer, network administrator, Search Engine Optimizer, Search Marketer etc.. etc.. etc.. its much easier for me to go in and request a larger budget for the entire system to include proprietary CMS optimized specifically for SEO to deliver results I have a 99% closing with these types of clients, and they eventually become even larger clients - my oldest client is now 7 years. Id much rather grow a client from nothing - They are who seeds my future, not the ones who already know everything. Sometimes, you just gotta work to find that diamond.