Published: Oct 21, 2008 - 10:49 am
Story Found By: dobata 1207 Days ago
Category: Analytics
9 Comments
9 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Hi Dobata - I guess we submitted at the same time. Since I can´t withdraw my submission, I´ll just Sphinn yours :)
You can edit title and text ...
The point of this article seems to be that the backlash is overblown because all that data is already out there and most of it for free. Even if we accept that premise, SEOmoz has another problem, their $79 a month fee or whatever it is, isnt worth it.
@skitzzo then dont pay it. There are tons of paid bid management tools out there and excel works just fine for me. No extra to use that, so I do. I am sure though that those tools are very useful for other companies much bigger than mine though. Its all in terms of if its of use to you. If its not, just dont use it.
For the most part, I think this backlash is niggardly sour grapes (something like what they call it Tall Poppy syndrome down under)... people picking on Rands project because it is game-changing and innovative... a big leap beyond Yahoo Site Explorer and Webmaster tools.Tons of people and bots crawl your site, use your bandwidth, violate your privacy a million times worse.... you just get the data in a crummy and limited format - or not at all.I think Linkscape is killer SEO tool and I am glad to have access to this data... its proven very useful in my work. I hope the Linkscape gets more comprehensive and more complete, rather than more limited. For me and the kind of SEO work I do, the competitive advantages far outweigh the concerns of tiny minority of SEOs involved in shadier side of link building.
"Tons of people and bots crawl your site, use your bandwidth, violate your privacy a million times worse...."Maybe on YOUR sites, not mine ;)
Why the backlash is not overblown???Linkscape is crawling my server, taking up my server resources, and my hosting company is asking me to upgrade to a better dedicated server and yet SEOMOZ is charging me and others US$79 for this tool which will reveal my links to my competitors. If Linkscape wants to crawl my server, then it has to offer its services for FREE like what the search engines did.
Its become a common strategy in "social media" to come around after a controversy has quieted down, and then post "it was overblown" statements, restate "the facts" and skew the history in one way or another. Fact is, the announcement and the facts were quite different, and the issue of scraping and reselling data is better understood as a result of these "controversial" discussions. It is also fact that, in direct response to what you say was "overblown", SEOMoz has agreed to work to follow the standards that they at first said were not important. Standards that practically every other automated bot has either agreed to or been cited for ignoring.The community should be thanking certain individuals who spent considerable time and effort keeping this controversy focused on the issues. They did it for reasons that do not include an $800 service fee. To now minimize their efforts, especially when they succeeded in getting SEOMOZ to admit they werent truthful and then agree to change their practices, would be shameful. Kudos to IncrediBill for doing what he does best... jumping in early and disclosing the true facts about what is crawling what, as evidence supported. If anyone is supporting "transparency" its guys like IncrediBill.
I think that the situation spiraled out of control thanks to alot of miscommunication and presumptions. I support SEOMOZ for what they do and use them avidly, but I will agree that alot was misrepresented at first. I commend Rand for stepping up and trying to explain the mo, but I also give props to IncrediBILL for doing his homework and keeping this in check. I will say that I am torn over this debate, its split into nay-sayers and praisers. Ill agree that the current opting out method is a bad idea, and very much so a headache for large websites, but I support what SEOMOZ is doing.As for the calling out on Data for a price - I see it in this simple analogy. You could build a radio using cheap parts from your local electronics, sure, or you could buy a factory-made one at a fraction of the effort. Yes, you can get the data yourself, so why make a fuss over it? Go do it.