Story Found By: DoshDosh 1592 Days ago
Category: Social Media
2 Comments
2 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Posted this over there:Its a nice idea, but youre not measuring it correctly. Right now, youre simply searching for any pages that Digg that have the domains as words on the pages, not as links. I mean, look at [site:digg.com yahoo.com]. Thats bringing up pages where people are putting in yahoo.com email addresses, among other things. Plus, in other cases, youre getting pages that have links from profiles rather than stories.A better way would be to do something like this:http://digg.com/search?s=youtube.com&submit=Search§ion=news&type=url&area=all&sort=mostOK, thats searching Digg itself for all stories to the youtube.com URL. Look at the bottom, and youll see there are around 1525 pages of results, 10 stories per page, so a saturation of 15,250 stories. Tick the buried option if you want to get more accurate. Even better, you might scrap and total the raw number of Diggs earned for all stories. Now that would be a metric -- which site has the most cumulative Diggs over time.
I agree that posting Yahoo email addresses will skew the data but I was trying to measure the popularity of a domain by seeing how many times it was mentioned on Digg, not just how many times it was Dugg. The two are not going to produce the same results.Also I wanted to bring up results that would be very easy for Google to incorporate into the algorithm, totalling the raw number of Diggs wouldnt be as easy.Finally there are some sites that are always Dugg by the same group of people which would mean less Digg saturation using my method. Sites that have Diggs from a wide range of people would appear in more categories and in more peoples profiles and therefore should be thought of as more popular.