Feeds- 23
- Sphinn It!
Daryl Quenet from Beanstalk Search Engine Positioning, wants your feedback on just what you would consider cloaking based on a deceptive site he found in the SERPs.
8 Comments
8 Comments
Sorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.
Sphinn Sponsors
Private Forums
Top 10 Most Sphunn Latest Submissions
- GMaps: What Happens When Google… (18)
- 7 Ways to Legitimately Build… (15)
- Yelp Reviews No Longer Appear in… (13)
- Yelp Review Filter Explained (13)
- Blogging in 2010: What You Need… (12)
- Bad SEO Advice for Real Estate… (10)
- Internet Marketing Jokes & Pick… (9)
- Google’s God Complex [PIC] (9)
- Is Page Rank important for link… (8)
- Should Clients Invest in an SEO… (7)
- I was using the original version and decided to…
- It's hard for me to find do follow links just to…
- @ebyun84 the &adtest parameter will be available…
- How does it deal with personalization -- if I…
- Further proof my staff have WAY too much time on…
- Nice, but still sacrificing impressions. Would…
- :) I had fun working with Christina on this.
- I don't really get this post. On the one hand,…
- That sentence reads like it's been through a…
- I am not a very good writer but I do love to…
- - Read more -
Latest Posts In Sphinn Blog
RSS Feeds
Upcoming Conferences
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Upcoming Webcasts
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
- Hey! That’s My Conversion – February 25, 2010
- Excel Tips & Tricks for PPC Success – March 18, 2010
- Paid Search and Big Brand Marketing – March 30, 2010
Comments
Hi Daryl, I have only read about cloaking. I know that many people that are making a sizable amount of money do indeed engage in some type of cloaking.
I would consider this cloaking. At least of the spammy sort. We have been using this method for what can be considered "optimizing" our Flash pages. However, we would only place content in the JS that is directly visible in the Flash. You’re a search engine? You see content. You’re a human visitor? You see the exact same content, just prettier.
It doesn’t really matter what method they’re using to accomplish this. The proper thing to serve a search engine spider if your site is in flash is the HTML equivalent of the content in the flash. That’s not what they’re doing here. Instead, they’ve got lots of text that they figure is what the search engine wants, even though they’re not showing it to people.All they need to do in order to make this honest is to offer the user access to either a flash or an HTML version of the site. The HTML version could contain the content they’re currently hiding from everyone but the spiders.
Agreed. Another even simpler thing would be to put the content under the flash movie. Then it wouldn’t be cloaking.
We are outing spam sites on Sphinn now?
Jill"We are outing spam sites on Sphinn now?"Did you mean "We are filing now spam reports to google in public" :-)
Apparently so Jill.
In the article it was proposed that just by looking at the site, there was no valid reason for it to rank for the phrase. To me that is misleading. All of the terms of the phrase were visible on the page even if not together as one phrase. My company info page ranks well for city (in company address) + a brand name that is only mentioned in reference to a return policy on that page. I question the intentions of the post. It’s not hard to say that what is done on the site is not best-practice (calling it by cloaking or any other name). However, my question is was the outing really a way to just please the prospective client that is a competitor to the site? Does that not raise it’s own ethical questions? This is a time I’d like to be able to vote down a post.