News Source: http://www.searchmarketinggurus.com
Published: Oct 08, 2007 - 08:41 am
Story Found By: debram 1586 Days ago
Category: SEM
18 Comments
Sorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.
News Source: http://www.searchmarketinggurus.com
Published: Oct 08, 2007 - 08:41 am
Story Found By: debram 1586 Days ago
Category: SEM
18 Comments
Upcoming Conferences
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
- SMX West - Feb. 28 - Mar. 1, 2012
- SMX Munich - Mar. 27-28, 2012
- SMX Toronto - Apr. 25-26, 2012
- SMX Sydney - May 1-2, 2012
- SMX London - May 15-16, 2012
- SMX Advanced Seattle - June 5-6, 2012
- SMX Paris - June 7-8 2012
- SMX Melbourne - Aug. 2012
- SMX East - Oct. 2-4, 2012
- SMX Stockholm - Sept. 15-16, 2012
- SMX Social Media Marketing - Dec. 2012
Latest News From Marketing Land
- Google Analytics For The Enterprise: Perception & Reality
- Yahoo Lifts The Curtain On Its Home Page Content Algorithm, C.O.R.E.
- LinkedIn Passes 150 Million Users, Reports Strong 4th Quarter
- Marketing Day: February 9, 2012
- Only 1 “Top Brand” Has Created A Google+ Page In The Past Two Months, Report Says
- - See more news at Marketing Land -
Upcoming Webcasts
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
- The Inside Scoop on Automating and Optimizing Your PPC Campaigns - February 21, 2012
Latest News From Search Engine Land
- Google Moves Away From Large Navigation Drop Down Menu
- Google Analytics Update to Organic Reports
- Bing Now A Full Point Ahead Of Yahoo In Search Share — comScore
- SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 9, 2012
- SPONSOR MESSAGE: The Purchase Path of Online Buyers – How Shoppers Use Email, Search, and Social
- - See more news at Search Engine Land -
Comments
Technically Jill, the first one you link to wasn’t about the outing at all, and the second one was about Rand himself being irresponsible over a time period, not just with the one post. I think what Li’s article is trying to get at is whether or not the root issue of Outing Thy Neighbor is in fact an unethical practice on it’s own.Thanks what I got from the article anyways.
Yeah - I say we vote it up. Sphunn.
I second Rand. Sphunn :-)
While I don’t care one bit about "ethical"/"non-ethical" debates (reminds me of college level essays discussing whether it’s "better" to opt fpr vacations at the seaside or in the mountains, duh...), ROI should be the main consideration here.Which is why I find outing anywhich sites plain dumb: Two (and, in fact, many more) people can play this game, and more often than not it’s just another case of the pot calling the kettle black.What this is bound to escalate to is internecine warfare - and what kind of a business model is that?Of course, it’s an entirely different game if you’re into Negative SEO - but then, that’s usually conducted anonymously which lends your ROI equation another twist...
Ralph - completely agree with you, and as I noted in the post, we at SEOmoz engage in link buying, and we’re certainly not trying to say it’s wrong OR unethical.I’ve said before, I make mistakes when blogging (and I expect this won’t be the last). But, yes, three popular Sphinns, a few blog posts and some forum threads all about my misstep should help to keep me in line from now on.
Unethical? I’m not sure that ethics has anything to do it. Personally, I’d stay away from the practice, but to each his own.
Well, since at the next conference I might unwittingly be having a beer with the person I recently outed my personal comfort level would be to handle sub rosa or keep my mouth shut.
I can’t believe this is even a discussion. YES, it is ethical. These people are running blogs about SEO. Are they supposed to not talk about an SEO tactic? If sites are buying links, are we supposed to keep it a secret? This is ridiculous.
Raising the question of ethics in this regard I think is a bit off point. It won’t make you any friends, but I don’t really see how it is "wrong" of you to point out that someone is buying/selling links. At the end of the day, the "penalty" they may or may not suffer is at the hand of the Google Webspam team and not the person who "outed" the site. I think it also discredits the Webspam team at least in terms of their resources to say that they have to rely on this kind of thing to do their jobs properly. That may not be so far off, though, considering Matt Cutts welcomed webmasters and users to report link broking.Bottom line: I’d like to leave ethics out of it when it comes to business. Is "outing" illegal? No. Is there anything wrong with Rand citing some quickly-found examples in a blog post on the topic? You can sit and debate this in your leisure time all you like, but Rand isn’t responsible for Google banning or penalizing any websites. The more quality websites Google penalizes for buying/selling links, the lower the quality of their results will be. They’ve got to have some internal controls to this end - I doubt the word from above is "penalize all paid links, quality be damned."
Wow the seo blog censors are still yapping about this one.ethics violation? were any of the sites that he outed competitors?
First, why are people still trying to capitalize on SEOmoz? This discussion is getting tiresome. I agree with fantomaster. Rand made a marketing / strategic blunder, not an ethical one; he has nothing to apologize for.
Yeah! What halfdeck said. (not much of a contribution by me, but he summed it up perfectly)
Well said, Halfdeck!Furthermore... to you fellow Sphinners who wish to report "Dofollow Links Sellers/Buyers" directly to Google, you can do it within Google Webmaster Tools:ToolsDownload data for all sitesReport spam in our indexReport paid linksRequest reconsideration
ryanol - yes, he did. which is why I am at the heart of things, questioning the ethical nature.He used Daily Blog Tips as an example showing for image ads that were not no followed. one of those four image ads was of Search Engine Guide (with the puppy), which is a direct competitor of SEOMoz. This is why some people have an issue with what has happened.
I’m with Halfdeck, I think it’s really unfortunate that people are still trying to capitalize off the misstep of someone else. It’s not about "ethics", it’s about creating linkbait off Rand’s name.And maybe I’m confused, but in what way is Search Engine Guide a direct competitor of SEOmoz? Simply because they’re educational resources? I think that’s a bit of a stretch.
Lisa - I would ask that you go talk to Robert Clough and Jennifer Laycock before you go and say it’s a stretch. Maybe you can then understand why they are competitors, rather than assuming they aren’t and trying to make this a little more personal than it needs to be.
storyspinner,If Rand’s intentions were just to harm compititors, he had two better options to do it than writing an article about it risking "people reactions":- report PageRank sellers compititors directly to Matt Cutts.- file a spam report directly to Google through webmasters tools.As you might have noticed, Rand didn’t chose those two options.
Harith ,Great points. And actually Rand could do that, but we’d never know, but I suspect that he did not do that. Only Rand can answer that question, as he would know what his actions wereHowever, me mentioning what I did, about the competitors - was in answer to ryanol’s question "were any of the sites he outed competitors" . I also pointed out that before saying it was a stretch, perhaps Lisa should talk to Jenn or Robert about the whole compeitor thing, as they feel otherwise. Anyway... that’s my "peace". Here endeth the Li comments :)go on.. cheer, I know ya wanna ;)