Published: Oct 08, 2007 - 08:41 am
Story Found By: debram 1586 Days ago
Category: SEM
18 Comments
18 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Technically Jill, the first one you link to wasnt about the outing at all, and the second one was about Rand himself being irresponsible over a time period, not just with the one post. I think what Lis article is trying to get at is whether or not the root issue of Outing Thy Neighbor is in fact an unethical practice on its own.Thanks what I got from the article anyways.
Yeah - I say we vote it up. Sphunn.
I second Rand. Sphunn :-)
While I dont care one bit about "ethical"/"non-ethical" debates (reminds me of college level essays discussing whether its "better" to opt fpr vacations at the seaside or in the mountains, duh...), ROI should be the main consideration here.Which is why I find outing anywhich sites plain dumb: Two (and, in fact, many more) people can play this game, and more often than not its just another case of the pot calling the kettle black.What this is bound to escalate to is internecine warfare - and what kind of a business model is that?Of course, its an entirely different game if youre into Negative SEO - but then, thats usually conducted anonymously which lends your ROI equation another twist...
Ralph - completely agree with you, and as I noted in the post, we at SEOmoz engage in link buying, and were certainly not trying to say its wrong OR unethical.Ive said before, I make mistakes when blogging (and I expect this wont be the last). But, yes, three popular Sphinns, a few blog posts and some forum threads all about my misstep should help to keep me in line from now on.
Unethical? Im not sure that ethics has anything to do it. Personally, Id stay away from the practice, but to each his own.
Well, since at the next conference I might unwittingly be having a beer with the person I recently outed my personal comfort level would be to handle sub rosa or keep my mouth shut.
I cant believe this is even a discussion. YES, it is ethical. These people are running blogs about SEO. Are they supposed to not talk about an SEO tactic? If sites are buying links, are we supposed to keep it a secret? This is ridiculous.
Raising the question of ethics in this regard I think is a bit off point. It wont make you any friends, but I dont really see how it is "wrong" of you to point out that someone is buying/selling links. At the end of the day, the "penalty" they may or may not suffer is at the hand of the Google Webspam team and not the person who "outed" the site. I think it also discredits the Webspam team at least in terms of their resources to say that they have to rely on this kind of thing to do their jobs properly. That may not be so far off, though, considering Matt Cutts welcomed webmasters and users to report link broking.Bottom line: Id like to leave ethics out of it when it comes to business. Is "outing" illegal? No. Is there anything wrong with Rand citing some quickly-found examples in a blog post on the topic? You can sit and debate this in your leisure time all you like, but Rand isnt responsible for Google banning or penalizing any websites. The more quality websites Google penalizes for buying/selling links, the lower the quality of their results will be. Theyve got to have some internal controls to this end - I doubt the word from above is "penalize all paid links, quality be damned."
Wow the seo blog censors are still yapping about this one.ethics violation? were any of the sites that he outed competitors?
First, why are people still trying to capitalize on SEOmoz? This discussion is getting tiresome. I agree with fantomaster. Rand made a marketing / strategic blunder, not an ethical one; he has nothing to apologize for.
Yeah! What halfdeck said. (not much of a contribution by me, but he summed it up perfectly)
Well said, Halfdeck!Furthermore... to you fellow Sphinners who wish to report "Dofollow Links Sellers/Buyers" directly to Google, you can do it within Google Webmaster Tools:ToolsDownload data for all sitesReport spam in our indexReport paid linksRequest reconsideration
ryanol - yes, he did. which is why I am at the heart of things, questioning the ethical nature.He used Daily Blog Tips as an example showing for image ads that were not no followed. one of those four image ads was of Search Engine Guide (with the puppy), which is a direct competitor of SEOMoz. This is why some people have an issue with what has happened.
Im with Halfdeck, I think its really unfortunate that people are still trying to capitalize off the misstep of someone else. Its not about "ethics", its about creating linkbait off Rands name.And maybe Im confused, but in what way is Search Engine Guide a direct competitor of SEOmoz? Simply because theyre educational resources? I think thats a bit of a stretch.
Lisa - I would ask that you go talk to Robert Clough and Jennifer Laycock before you go and say its a stretch. Maybe you can then understand why they are competitors, rather than assuming they arent and trying to make this a little more personal than it needs to be.
storyspinner,If Rands intentions were just to harm compititors, he had two better options to do it than writing an article about it risking "people reactions":- report PageRank sellers compititors directly to Matt Cutts.- file a spam report directly to Google through webmasters tools.As you might have noticed, Rand didnt chose those two options.
Harith ,Great points. And actually Rand could do that, but wed never know, but I suspect that he did not do that. Only Rand can answer that question, as he would know what his actions wereHowever, me mentioning what I did, about the competitors - was in answer to ryanols question "were any of the sites he outed competitors" . I also pointed out that before saying it was a stretch, perhaps Lisa should talk to Jenn or Robert about the whole compeitor thing, as they feel otherwise. Anyway... thats my "peace". Here endeth the Li comments :)go on.. cheer, I know ya wanna ;)