Published: Oct 08, 2007 - 12:53 pm
Story Found By: DavidWallace 1690 Days ago
Category: Link Building
13 Comments
13 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Bingo David... Bingo. (and not the dog either) :)
Yup, I have been thinking about making the switch from Text Link Ads to either none at all (paid links are a small fraction of my earnings) or "underground" links that only the advertiser and I know were paid for (i.e. a link in the content of a blog post that happens to be related to the merchants site). The downside is this always feels a little dishonest (readers dont have any way to decipher whats a paid link or not). Oh well, this article gives food for thought on the subject.
Yep, this is the truth. Nothing wrong with going underground - its even kinda fun in a secret agent sort of way. When I see sites that display links under a header like, "sponsors," I just have to ask: why would you not change that in light of what has happened. Google has made its position clear - theyre coming after link brokers and buyers. If I were involved in something like this, which I happen not to be (although Ive been eyeing it), Id be scrambling to mask these links as well as possible as soon as possible.
Good article, thanks for that.At the end of the day, all these Google antics will merely achieve one thing: raising the price tag for paid links. Link sellers and brokers will adapt, clients will undergo severe screening, NDAs will be tightened up - and pricing will reflect the additional effort required to keep everything functional. (Quite similar to the drug market, really.)But will paid links go away? No such luck: The only way to kill this industry is by not making ANY links count for whatever anymore. After which, links will still be sold - for their traffic value.
I am sorry but I disagree with the article in amny ways.Google is attacking mainly paid reviews, not paid links - there are a few cases of people with just paid links that have been hit, but this could also be due to other factors such as having specific sales pages mentioning PageRank as a reason to purchase a link.With paid reviews there are ethical and legal considerations. You cant hide it - well you could but that would be deplorable.As I wrote earlier today, I dont sell PageRank
@ AndyBeardWe have yet to buy any paid reviews for clients yet. The sites I have personally see hit by the Google war guns are content related sites that simply sell text links among other advertising. They do not promote them as links to help sites rank well or to benefit from PageRank. However some of them do shoot themselves in the foot by making the links easily identifiable as "paid links" to Googles algorithm and/or having affiiate banners/links for certain link brokers.
Im not a fan of paid links in the way most are but not for the reasons youd think. Paid links are advertising - a media buy, not unlike advertorial. Ours is a PR thing, not advertising. Regardless, search engines should be smart enough to pick out such links and do what they need to do without "throwing the baby out with the bathwater".
As usual I agree very much with you, Fantom. However, it is going to be much harder for text link brokers and pay per post companies to work
Yeah, paid links should go underground - they should be buried altogether! Just like Walmart trying to pass off conventional produce as organic, the attempt to legitimize paid links as organic is self-serving and disingenuous. Ultimately, the user community should determine relevance, not the search engines, and certainly not marketers. When linking happens in a truly organic fashion, without the market making a commodity of the connection, everybody wins. Short cuts like paid links only undermine the integrity of search results overall - if you want rankings, try earning them. Encourage your clients to create content that is worth linking to! Or advise them to put their money where it belongs, in Adsense.
@David you might be monitoring many different sites and monitoring different conversations. I could easily list 30, possibly 40 sites that write reviews that have been hit, and they are generally the more prominent earners in the paid reviews writing "profession" - and I wouldnt class any of those as "big hitters".I also know blogs that have written paid reviews that dont use nofollow on the links, that Matt Cutts is known to read, that dont seem to have received a penalty.The problem is many of these sites also carry text links, so it is hard to pin down.Then there are the companies that play the "holier than thou" route, who stick nofollow on their advertising in the sidebar, but drop links to their sponsors every chance they can get, with links directly rather than through some redirect or database of similar companies.
@Andy the "holier than thou" people are who I look for these days. In very competitive markets youre going to have to buy links and youre going to have to be sneaky about it. We can talk about linkbait, viral content, etc forever but links is still where its at and until they figure out another way and eliminate the value of the link, I and many others will be buying links under the radar.Id rather not have to subvert the search engines but its the easiest and fastest way.
Broken link...article will not show.
This is EXACTLY why we started our underground text link marketplace. It is the only way to go these days.The thing people also forget here is that the links should be high quality. Luckily, a high quality links goes hand-in-hand with paid links that arent detected or discounted by google currently.If you want to go underground, use us. *shameless but relevant plug* http://www.textlinkcenter.com