Published: Oct 10, 2007 - 10:03 am
Story Found By: Lyndon 1693 Days ago
Category: SEM
2 Comments
2 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
This incites some good thoughts on the future of social networking. We can definitely expect more vertical search depth from social platforms. What would you call it? Relationships tagging? Already, that functionality is one of the most exciting things about Facebook: photo tagging and friend details are just some of the ways Facebook is able to analyze network connections. For advertising and seo the more search-able data there is, the better.I somewhat disagree with showing a different profile to different groups of friends. I have a broad spectrum of personal, professional, and network contacts on Facebook and I dont have a problem appearing as the same person for all of them. Personal contacts seem to respect an unwritten boundary and keep private anything questionable by messaging. Dont we have enough control over our online images? At the same time, I wont stand against progress if a complex "social negotiation" is what the people want. I expect that many people would embrace that type of feature. Its something we all do already, interpersonally. But is this a question of usability or of advertising relevancy? Separating contacts to view one of a few unique profiles doesnt offer any specific data about said contacts. To use Mikes example, it doesnt tell us who in his network likes baseball. For the purpose of boundaries, I prefer Lucy Kellaways suggestion of a limited profile for less familiar friends. In the case of advertising, if the demographic info available on Facebook isnt enough to base an ad recommendation on then I dont know what is.What are everyones thoughts on this? Lyndon?
After I wrote my original post, I started to wonder if maybe different people would want different behaviors out of social networking. (This post seems to confirm that.) I also wondered (squint) whether my reaction is a baby boomer attitude of separating work from personal lives that is becoming so 20th century. (I still feel WAY more comfortable with the LinkedIn approach than with Facebook, but I am old.) I am only on Facebook a few days now, but I am fascinated by the way people interact and I am thinking a lot about where this goes. Thanks for providing your persepective--I can really use it.