- 10
- Sphinn It!
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.seo-theory.com)
Category: Other Searching
Clipped to Evernote for future reference.
3 Comments
3 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009
Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.
Comments
Unique visitors is not a good measure. In fact, that's sort of what we used to have before we had number of searches. The problem is that a particular visitor to a site might do more than one search. Moreover, automated queries are unlikely to be a major factor in skewing results given that two of the services use browser-metering software. I can't even see that ISP data would be that skewed. In addition, rather than Google being overstated, it's probably understated. Consider how Google is in the 60-70% range of share of US searches yet many site owners find it drives 80-90% of its traffic. Number of searches isn't perfect, has plenty of problems, but nope -- unique visitors isn't a better number.
I don't see Michael's data representation as an "instead" but an "also" view on search engine usage.
Unique visitors vs. queries performed is a lot like unique visitors vs. page views: different stories about the same thing.
Adding Michael's view can help hold on to a realistic feel of search penetration outside our techno-world: 70% of all quries go to Google souns deafening (and it is) but it doesn't equal that the majority of searchers go to Google.
Just adding to that 70+% of queries picture PEW's data that only a litle under half of people online will do a search in a given day changes my impression of their daily reach.
Given that half of the people online today will *not* come to your site via any search engine, the fact that we often see 75-90% influence by Google could be saying a lot about a site; either about the type of site (one-time use) or about its quality/stickiness.
Oversimplified, botht metrics and my use of PEW's data, but puzzle pieces none the less: can't discard one for the other.
My $0.02: how many people search for "Google" at all other SEs? If Ask is to be believed: http://about.ask.com/en/docs/2008/topqueries.shtml - a LOT!!!!
If your a unique, and go to Google quickly, you get counted for both, but really, is the guy in a $7,000 suit really an Ask unique I mean, COME ON!