Published: Dec 10, 2008 - 08:52 am
Story Found By: Ruud 1159 Days ago
Category: Searching
8 Comments
8 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
In response to that "big story" part -- I think we all would like to point back and say, "see, I predicted that in XYZ!" -- hence the bold statements and predictions. On top of that search (information retrieval + sorting the retrieved information) is so ... black box ... to most of us that simply by predicting stuff boldly one can create the impression of visionary. Nothing needs to come from these predictions as unless theyre confirmed by Google you cant be 100% sure they came true or not.
Tnx fer da Sphinn Ruud - I am also curious what, if any, editorial responsibility industry authority media should have? Too often those publications we look up to are engaging in bold statements and hype to get readers engaged. I personally dont care, as I tend to use my own senses, research and testing. But what of less experienced SEO enthusiasts? I had to spend time talking recently with a client that went to PubCOn and picked up some bad information. Why am I doing this? Because supositions and musings become gospel with those less inclined to investigate for themselves.My fav guy, Bill (Slawski) taught me early on to be using phrases like "Google may be" "How Google might" "One way search engines could" - there isnt much room to misinterpret that. When we have statements like; "Ranking reports are dead" (citing personalized search/behavioral metrics) and "There is a real possibility that bounce rate is a significant ranking factor right now." - It is easy to see how this can cause undue mythology in the indsutry. As you said, without some type of serious research or statements from Google, we can do nothing more than speculate to a large degree... Granted I am more the geek than the marketer, so Big Stories arent as meaningful as actionable information....
This post on the same topic was already hot less than two weeks ago? http://sphinn.com/story/86981
Bounce rates are related to quality of content, as are SERP ranks. Therefore the two may be indirectly related.
Of course they are. Everything you do on your browser is recorded in their cookie(even when your not at Google) open their cookie and take a look for yourself. If they show it to you at my account then its probably important information. Thats why so many people recommend not being a link miser. Link to other pertinent information a user may want, to lower your bounce rate.
Hi Ruud. I just published an eBook around this very concept - not just bounce rates, but related user actions - and how we can prepare our websites to adapt to this evolving algorithm. It is not clear to what degree, if any, bounce rates arepart of the algorithm yet, but there is no question in my mind that it will be. Bots might be an issue, but thats part of the cops and robbers games that the search engines and the spammer will keep playing. Its no more insurmountable that automated link-building.My ebook is at http://www.seo-writer.com/books/sticky-seo.html and is free (no charge, no cost, no upsell).
Google must match user intent with content delivered to effectively incorporate bounce rate into the Algorithm. Theyll never do that well enough to risk thier search business.Also, there is a firewall between buy side (adwords) and revenue side (adsense), and using bounce rate comes way to close to that line for Google to risk monopoly claims from Uncle Sam.
Rae, yes the topic was covered and went hot, but if you read this article youll notice that Dave talks about more than just bounce rate. He talks about how people arent testing or researching things enough, but instead extrapolating something they saw to create the result they wanted. Dave goes on to say that yes Bounce Rate is being used, but its not a major part of the ranking. He introduces the idea of dirty signals and explains them.The post is well thought out and definitely deserves to go hot. It matters little that it covers the same over-all topic that http://sphinn.com/story/86981 does, beause it introduces new concepts and explains a lot more.