Top 100 SEO & Internet Marketing Blogs

Sorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.

38
Sphinn It!

Went Hot: Oct 12, 2007 - 08:41 am
Posted By: kevgibbo 642 Days ago
Source: http://www.blogstorm.co.uk
Category: SEO

Nice list of SEO blogs ordered by Technorati and Alexa rank.

16 Comments

Who Desphunn This (0)

Comments

from toprank 642 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Giving equal weight to Alexa and Technorati? That’s funny.

from Lyndon 642 Days ago #

Votes: 0

We all like lists, especially when we are on them. ;) Although should be taken with a pinch of salt given the metric. I’m not sure problogger should even be on it. But it’s a good bit of fun.The next challenge is to make it live with Ajax :)

from ViperChill 642 Days ago #

Votes: 0

haha Yep, i wish there was a way to read the number of subscribers on a feedburner chicklet because theat would be a cool ajax listInteresting criteria to rank for because the rankings will change daily.

from toprank 642 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Glen, ask and you shall receive: SEM Blogs by RSS Subscribers http://tinyurl.com/2z3lxzUnfortunatley, it’s only a sample of the 100 and only those that use Feedburner with the feedcounts "published".

from DoshDosh 642 Days ago #

Votes: 0

I am not so sure about some meta-blogging blogs being classified as internet marketing.. unless you are going with an extremely relaxed definition of the term..

from patrickaltoft 642 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Obviously the fact we use Alexa and Technorati makes this list slightly inaccurate but if you look at the results I reckon they are pretty good.

from cre8pc 642 Days ago #

Votes: -1

Why is the Cre8asite blog in the #40 and #83 spot?

from CristianMezei 642 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Because others have a much better Alexa rank for example ? :)

from iBrian 641 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Heh, the best blogs have the least traffic have the biggest signal to noise ratio. Most I visit aren’t even up there. :)

from theGypsy 641 Days ago #

Votes: 0

It’s a strange Day when Matt (Cutts) is listed as a top SEO/Internet marketing blog - HA! Last I heard he was workin for ’the man’ and wasn’t actually doing SEO or internet marketing. Did he get fired when I wasn’t looking???Way to go Matt - maybe you should get that ’ShadySEO’ site going on huh?

from MiriamEllis 641 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Congratulations Kim, Bill, Matt McGee and all my pals who made that list. You folks really deserve it! Woo hoo!Miriam

from Sugarrae 641 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Problem is, the numbers are wrong - at least in the case of my blog - so now I don’t trust the numbers on any of the others. He has listed for my blog:98 sugarrae.com 25394 78988 104382when in actuality, it should be:89 sugarrae.com 12894 78988 91882according to: http://technorati.com/blogs/www.sugarrae.com and that rank is actually "higher" (meaning it’s less) than usual, so it isn’t that it took a "jump" suddenly - not sure where he’s pulling the tech rank from, but it doesn’t appear to be very accurate.For instance, Matt’s tech rank is 85 on this list, but it’s actually 90 as far as I can see. Stuntie is listed as 1795, but T has him at 2,111. seofaststart.com is listed on this list as 14911 when it’s really 17,055 - of the few I checked very quickly.

from Sem-Advance 641 Days ago #

Votes: -1

A prime reason people should worry less about biased lists... and more about how to be sure you don’t need to be on a list, to make 6 figures a year ;->

from Hobo 641 Days ago #

Votes: 0

It’s still a decent list of good blogs - although it’s innacurate again - it’s only 99. revenews.com is in twice - sorry!

from patrickaltoft 640 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Sugarrae, your blog has 2 different rankings depending on the url:http://technorati.com/blogs/www.sugarrae.com%2Fblog%2F?reactionsThats why the numbers were wrong.

from ViperChill 637 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Lee is that actually ranking them basd on the number, i.e is matt cutts lost all his subscribers would it move to the bottom?