Published: Jan 11, 2009 - 03:44 pm
Story Found By: UtahSEOpro 1620 Days ago
Category: SEO
8 Comments
8 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Good, easy to follow analysis. This makes it a bit easier to make a decision on whether to redo menu systems. Perhaps a text menu at the bottom for Yahoo is a good temporary fix to such problems until Yahoo catches up.
I agree that the search engines have made progress in following JS links, but Im not sure it works in all cases. And its certainly not the same as non-JavaScript links. I think it also depends how the JavaScript is coded. Maybe we will end up looking at JavaScript like Flash. Google can supposedly index Flash now, but its still not the same as good old fashioned HTML with plain text links.
Doh - I take back what I said. Thatll teach me to read the article properly before commenting!
So crawling and indexing has improved somewhat for JavaScript. What about flow of PageRank and use of keywords in anchor text?I can not see SEO best practice for linking changing quite yet.
I agree with semanjoe that using Javascript for menus is definately not best practise. I dont see the need for it in 99% of cases. If you really want to use it then you can still use valid HTML markup and just apply the javascript as needed.
The website is Cloaking the "new" menu.
I agree with the conclusion since Ive seen evidence of JS being crawled. However, I disagree with the way the conclusion was arrived at. As compiler has pointed out, the site is cloaking. Change your user agent to Google and youll see the menu that is cached by Google.
Hmm. It seems that this "feature" is built into DNN. I did not consider the possibility theyd do something so convoluted when a NOSCRIPT tag might produce the same results. Perhaps Google and DNN should have a chat. Since the Google-specific content is equivalent to the visible content, this technique probably wouldnt be considered black hat, but it certainly isnt best practices. Add to the above article the fact that you need to check your DNN menu system to see if it is cloaking. I wonder if Google is going to ban all the DNN sites that have this "feature". Your thoughts, Matt Cutts?