brianfidler
from brianfidler 1293 Days ago#
What I find interesting and disconcerting at the same time is that many of the images don’t relate to the found site/article. It’s almost like they did a separate search for images relating to a term and then just randomly added images to the search results.Also their data is OLD. I did a search on my name which I always do to satisfy my narcissistic ways, and my like-named nemesis, who happens to play professional poker showed up everywhere. Even a Wikipedia posting for him which was deleted at least 30 days ago. When i finally did find a reference to me, it was from a posting I made in 2001 to a forum. Perhaps they need to order their database so that recency of data has greater relevance. And while they are at it, they ought to make certain the image associated with a listing actually relates to that listing. In other searches I performed I had similar weird results which were certainly not "better" or "more relevant" than Google’s results and frankly felt just a bit random. I’ll chalk it up to launching too early so may try again in a month or two...or maybe not.
Story: Cuil Launches -- Can This Search Start-Up Really Best Google?