webuildpages

from webuildpages 286 days ago #
Votes: 4 | Vote:
+ -

I would agree with Nick totally ;) - use a variety of link text, but focus on what you're targeting.

from webuildpages 292 days ago #
Votes: 2 | Vote:
+ -

Loved this quote:

"but did you know that there is a special keyword density that Google absolutely loves, that you can't go wrong with? That is the magical density that nobody, and i mean NOBODY is teaching you. Not Aaron, not Sullivan, Not SEoMoz. I reveal the secrets of keyword density that nobody has told in public before. Just changing your density can have a great effect on your rankings."

hehe

from webuildpages 299 days ago #
Votes: 1 | Vote:
+ -

Beautiful...actually it's more like 14 seperate posts all covering "what's going on" in the SEM industry. Gret reading!

from webuildpages 335 days ago #
Votes: 9 | Vote:
+ -

So the stanford daily goes from a PR9 to a PR7....so what...the toolbar pagerank was never accurate anyways (the toolbar is fairy dust green)...and it doesn't look like the stanford daily dropped any in rankings.....dropping it from a PR9 to a PR7 does what google wants anyways....now the price drops for the ads...but again....the stanford daily ranks just as it always did.....so does every other link selling PR9....now they're 7's...and ranking just the same....fairy dust folks.....one last FUD before they make it go away.

[edited out long rant....voices in my head saying "must stay under the radar"..."must not piss off matt" ;)]

from webuildpages 342 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

First Looksmart kills Zeal, now Wisenut.....wonder if they're imploding on themselves.

I actually liked wisenut...really.


from webuildpages 342 days ago #
Votes: 5 | Vote:
+ -

I think you streatched what I was saying, and the point I was making, to cover something I wasn't saying, on a point I wasn't making.

I don't think anyone should cheat anyone. eneough said.

Jim


from webuildpages 334 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

I've got a comment on there with my thoughts.

from webuildpages 347 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

To quote Danny "there's more and more evidence that Google is starting to go beyond the historical paid links punishment of not allowing you to pass PageRank love to actually downgrading your site"

First I've heard of that....in fact, I don't believe it today.

All huge sites that I've seen selling links for years...and have had PR blocked from passing for years, all still rank killer....I've yet to see or hear of a site that's been punished for selling ads....only PR Blocking filters imposed.


from webuildpages 354 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

halfdeck...I wonder if he 301'd anything there.

from webuildpages 361 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Congrats Rob! and thanks to all the editors as well.

from webuildpages 424 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Happy B-Day!

from webuildpages 424 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

If it's just stuff like this:

http://www.searchbistro.com/secretlab.html

then I don't think there's any cause for concern.

but if it's stuff like

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&rls=GGLB,GGLB:1969-53,GGLB:en&q=mesothelioma+more:condition_treatment&cx=disease_for_patients&sa=N&oi=cooptsr&resnum=0&ct=col1&cd=1

(note "Labeled by" under search results), then there appears to be more of a human impact on rankings.

Note: (beta testing and kicking tires...posting links...and long links...will ya take these? )


Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX China (Nanjing) - Sept. 23-24
SMX Stockholm - Sept. 23-24: See who's speaking or register now.
SMX East (New York City) - Oct. 6-8: See the agenda or register today and save!
SMX London - Nov. 4-5: Pre-agenda rate now available. Click here.