Calendar
Network
Feeds
ANOnym
Well, he does have a point. Sort of. If it were "patience", "more time", etc, just not "10 years".
Well, it proves that Kim is right and our SEO ladies are great :)
http://cre8pc.com/blog/archives/494
Story: Enterprise 2.0: 12+ Productive Ways to Use Wikis for Business and Organizational Communication
Maybe the poor soul meant this link:
http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/07/13/15-productive-uses-for-a-wiki/
Now, apart from free, add the format of "Unconference" and you get a killer conference that we are going to attend right now at Donna's house.
Story: The Value of 50 Sphinns
US People to Use Only Twitter for Voting This Year
You Can Only Vote via Twitter This Year
The actions of NS make it seem like they are following some black hat guidebook.
Obviously, there should be a healthy balance of staying in touch and wasting time sharing meaningless stuff 5 hours a day. 20% of actions yield 80% of results, so that should be a good rule of thumb here, too.
I think the point is pretty clear.
It is not who wrote the stories or who have submitted them. But how the Sphinn community can identify and vote up/down fake/bad stories. So far, it seems, the Sphinners prefer to vote first, read second.
Sphinn is an ad platform for SMX (and advertisers), how can that not be monetary bias? Any relationships of Sphinn owners and other SEOs are indirect bias as well. Pretending not to understand or ignoring it doesn't show you as a good marketer, really.
"All in all (as I explained in my email), if things aren't crystal - we let the community decide what's hot and what's not."
That's right. And you remove Andy Beard's article after it was approved by the community (voted hot). Surely, that's moderating, not "letting the community decide what's hot and what's not".
I kinda liked his book in RSS format, but oh well, a new page a year can't hurt ;)
Story: How To *NOT* Get Dugg
I have to say this should be useful to really popular, Digg-liked sites. Regular bloggers probably shouldn't worry about this. However, this functionality should be useful, if made easier to implement and toggle.
Weird. I still had the same problem as JohnWeb described. Opera 9.25 here.
Another interesting point that a link from an unpaid post about a sponsor was considered paid. Surely that's not the case, because the author was inspired by the product and, above else, spent his/her time on reviewing the product and "editorializing" the link.
Surely there are other methods to prevent spam (nofollow is the worst of all, IMHO) and Danny would know about them and share them with Wired (and his readers)?
Heh. If only bosses knew and could afford not to fear that. But companies leave that to HR.
Well, so far this part seems to work well, it appears. However, lower quality (not spam) still sifts through, though. But the Stumble button is one click away ;)
Don't you see that little "Edit" link near the title/description/category, etc? Or it wears off with time? The story submitter usually can edit the submission.
No, I am not. I have a pure text theme :) One more reason to love it, I guess (apart from site speed/crawlability).
(searchkari, to attempt to predict the answer, I'd say that both of them have ways of making content on various topics popular, because people are not restricted by their landing pages. SU has groups, btw.)
About SU: Do you plan to study, research and document the patterns people follow, when stumbling/thumbing/sending stuff?
Are you going to release an Opera toolbar, if not with all the necessary features? Maybe official working plugins (Javascript snippets) to insert into the personal bar in Opera, at least?
Thank you for asking us, Danny.
Garrett: When we'll be able to have more than 200 friends? Why restrict it, if it helps make targetting more precise and adds more fun to the community?
Well, every time you advertise a product for money, not for value, your reputation goes down. What's so secret or complex about it?
Story: Seth Godin Gets in Wrong, GASP!