Calendar
Network
Feeds
AccuraCast
FFS. Isn't this discussion old now? I'm tired of reading it in like a 100 different places. If you wanna do it, do it. If you don't wanna, don't. But don't rant about why / why not to the whole world. Most of us don't give a shit how badly you do your SEO!
Oh, and BTW.... enough of the "matt cutts said this".... "no matt cutts said that". We can all read and make up our minds for ourselves as well.
(Now i feel like i've just admonished my 42+16 favourite children. But what the hell. If it shuts this stupid discussion up, it's well worth it)
Sphunn for giving me the perfect excuse to grab a beer tonight - "social market research"!!!
I'm assuming the people who would need such a guide aren't seasoned veterans. So any tips on how to get submitted by a top user?
Lol @ Graywolf
Nice one! Someone ought to teach all these cowboys a lesson! They manage to give the entire industry a bad rep and make life tougher for the rest of us.
What about managing damaging posts by bitter ex-employees? We did that for a client, an I don't think that is necessarily unethical. So others though have asked to do rather dodgy reputation management, which we politely turned down as it went against our own principles.
Story: NoFollow: An SEO Red Flag?
Eric, I think Yahoo! are misrepresenting the eventuality of nofollow as a causality. The "nofollow" tag was recognised by W3C back in 1997 to prevent robots from accessing certain parts of a site that were not meant to be indexed. The rel="nofollow" attribute, strictly speaking, was meant to be an extension of this directive. The fact that it's ended up being used primarily to prevent blog spam is just an unfortunate eventuality of poor marketing ethic.
« previous1 next »
Story: You'd Be Wise To "No Follow" This Dubious SEO Advice