TCSM

from TCSM 9 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

@bentley007 cheers man :)

from TCSM 29 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

@monitis "Who is is deadly for" ask your wallet! :p

from TCSM 53 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Glad you all liked.

@kichus, I'll grant you that it can create problems. However, you can simply nofollow the link, and it's fixed.

@rmurphey i know using onclick isn't great, but it is easy, and this will cater to the largest audience. And event tracking will be cool when it's out of beta, but until then, I'd still use this method.


from TCSM 53 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

@g1smd cheers; edited

from TCSM 95 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

But surely that means that keyword density does in fact matter? *slaps forehead in shock*

from TCSM 108 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

@evilgreenmonkey Nooooo...

Actually, it's from a whacking great file I got from AOL. I'm guessing you're going to the bbq on the 13th?

from TCSM 107 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Good man. I shall see you there!

from TCSM 107 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

@philippe glad you enjoyed it!
@mindy it's almost certainly skewed sightly, and as it says in the article, mileage will vary from SERP to SERP.

from TCSM 107 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

@140local the data is from AOL log files. They're fairly available, if you know where to go.
And no, the 42% is nothing to do with PPC. As stated in the article, this data excludes PPC clicks. Not because people click on things and they're wrong, and that's the 42% or whatever. It's just completely PPC free.

And even if that was the case, it still gives you data on 19.4 million click throughs from SERPs. If you can't find something useful from that...

from TCSM 107 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

http://www.gregsadetsky.com/aol-data/ Oh, and I hope you're not on a metered connection...

And yes, there's no PPC data in this. If there was, it'd make the whole thing less useful, as it'd obfuscate the data. And yes, it does mean 42% of people don't click anything. Why's that surprising?

Once again, the 42% isn't people that clicked PPC. They either performed another search, or hit back, or went somewhere else.

from TCSM 107 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

The data shown (percentages) only relates to peopel who clicked on something. So it's the 58% left over. Sorry for the confusion.

from TCSM 107 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

No worries. To qualify further, I suspect that there's no PPC data, based on what I know of click-throughs on PPC links based on several years of running campaigns. It just doesn't fit, to my eye.

And the UID is obfuscated IP address.

from TCSM 107 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Ahhh, I get you. :) Sorry for the misunderstanding.

from TCSM 106 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

It's been reported on a lot. The data isn't particularly new. However, as stated in the post, it's more a response to a YOUmoz post, to refresh people's memories.

from TCSM 106 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

It is indeed.

from TCSM 133 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Thanks to everyone who Sphunn this! It's hugely appreciated.

from TCSM 152 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

You could make it even niftier by having a gradient overlay to make the text fade out at the top as you scroll down. Other than that, looks pretty nice!

from TCSM 154 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Glad you found it useful. Anything you think needs explaining further or in more detail?

from TCSM 435 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Good call Danny :) Oh, and nice work with the tree house!

Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX West - Feb. 10-12, 2009
SMX Munich - April 22-23, 2009
SMX Advanced - June 2-3, 2009

Search Marketing Now

Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.

Upcoming Webcasts: