liamvictor
I've had a few follow me and at first glance they look legitimate but you soon find that every nth post was an affiliate link.
I have a client that is 1 (home page), 2 (sitelinks) and 3 (specific product) for their name, yet we still do PPC on their brand and site name.
The return is 35 times the investment and we get to see how many searches were performed on those names. What's not to like?
Story: Top 10 SEO Myths
For me I got here via twitter, sphunn it, then read it, thought "oh hum", and carried on with my day rather than going back to unsphinn. I'm only back because of the conversation on twitter and wanted to see the comments.
It's not a good aticle, but it's not so bad to merrit all of this discussion.
Lyndon - no I don't aggree with everything on that page, can one ever read a SEO page and agree with everything on it? ;-) What i didn't agree with brought a wry smile and that was fine by me.
Weird they missed Stumbleupon which began Jun 21, 2002 - http://1.stumbleupon.com/
Personally I don't pop by here enough, so when someone pings me I'm usually more than happy to see some decent content, and delighted to be included in the "conversation".
In fact, I think I'm going to make something to agregate my friends (and those I stalk) submits so I can stay a little more on top of things here.
Whilst at Joost's blog check out his meta robots plugin for WordPress.
I like the "Download data for all sites" feature too.
Now if only they'd show where the link phrases come from in the Statistics > Page analysis section I'd be a very happy boy
« previous1 next »



Story: Twitter Spam: Myth Or Reality? - Danny Sullivan at Daggle